PRODUCTIVITY
IMPROVEMENT THROUGH ECRS METHODOLOGY
M.Laxman[1], Prabumanirathinam[2]
and Dr. B. Vijaya Ramnath [3],c,*
[1],[ 2] P.G. students, Department of Mechanical
Engineering, Sri Sairam Engineering College, West Tambaram, Chennai-44.
[3]Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Sri Sairam Engineering College, West Tambaram, Chennai-44.
*Corresponding
Author
ABSTRACT
Present day’s
industries are focusing on improving productivity by reducing wastages
associated to system and manufacturing activity .This paper aimed to Reduce set
up Time, Increase Production in Company and increase the Profit through mass
production. Some techniques are used to reduce setup time and increase productivity
by converting the internal set up activities to external set up by carrying out
number of iterations.
Keywords: Productivity
improvement, ECRS methodology, Conversion of activities
INTRODUCTION
The productivity of industry can be
improved by reducing the wastages associated with manufacturing activity
manufacturing activity, processing activity and some non value added activities
. This paper proposes ECRS concept through which more number of operations can
be combined or eliminated by performing more number of iterations . The result
shows that the final number of operations is reduced by 76 percentage as
compared with the existing stage of assembly process .
LITERATURE SURVEY
SHINGO, 1985
Single-Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) , a technique
used to reduce the equipment setup time. SMED had an objective to accomplish
setup times in less than ten minutes, the number of minutes are expressed by a
single digit. Not all setups could be literally reduced to this time, between
one and nine minutes and this is the goal of the SMED methodology (Shingo,
1985). SMED, also known as Quick Change over of Tools
R.P.ORTICIO Published Dec 15,
2010 5S and Good Housekeeping
Managing efficiency in work area is important to
business in more ways than one. The management, care, and servicing of
facilities and equipment needs careful attention and thorough implementation to
achieve desired results. Delays due to downtime, readjustment, and setup are
common occurrences during machine failures and breakdowns.
WALTER SHEWHART
The pioneering
statistician who developed statistical process control in the 1930’s ,referred
to as the Shewhart cycle. PDCA (Plan-do-check-act) is an iterative four – step
problem-solving process typically used in business process improvement. It is
also known as the Deming cycle, Shewhart cycle, Deming wheel, or
plan-do-check-act.
MANIKANDAN T AND SENTHIL KUMARAN S
Manikandan
and Senthil Kumaran focused on reducing the Manufacturing Lead Time in a
production layout of an engine valve manufacturing company. The layout
experienced problems like high inventory, higher setup time and more part
travel, etc. A six sigma tool, DMAIC was used to approach the problem. Details
with regard to Product mix, Volume of production, Work – In – Progress(WIP),
and Sequence of operations were collected. And a simple heuristic technique was
proposed to decrease the Manufacturing Lead Time and the approach was validated
using WITNESS, a simulation software. The simulation of the proposed heuristic
technique in WITNESS software showed considerable reduction in Work – In
– Progress (WIP) and thereby resulted in monetary benefits. When this
proposed heuristic technique was implemented, the situation demanded a lean
tool, Eliminate – Combine – Rearrange – Simplify (ECRS). In total, the
setup time for a particular process step reduced from the existing 20 hours per
month to 6 hours per month
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
Problem Definition
After recession
the Export schedule came down drastically to nearly 33% .In order to fulfill
the new customer requirement, new flow line was set to meet the current
schedule as the original flow line machines were spared to other new products.
The new flow line was set considering the optimum usage of man, machine etc.
But, with this flow line the following disadvantages were noticed.
·
Cell
efficiency is low – 76% due to various losses like set up loss, tool change
loss, start up loss etc.
·
Additional
wages paid for extra working hours to meet the customer schedule
·
No
adequate time for proper Preventive
Maintenance hence leads to more equipment failure
·
Operator
Morale is reduced due to extra working hours.
·
More
scrap and rework during setting change over, extra working hours etc.
The problematic
area was the Vertical Machining Centre (VMC), Chiron, where the setting
changeover was taken once in a week for machining two different part numbers as
per customer schedule. Due to this frequent setting change the losses were more
.The losses includes the setting change over time loss, jigs and fixture search
time loss, adjustment loss, inspection loss, rejection loss etc.
These losses led
to low cell efficiency, and this led to the following problems
·
Extra
working hours were planned.
·
Delivery
delay and sometimes failure.
·
High
machining defects.
·
Low
operator morale.
PROPOSED
METHODOLOGY
5S
PDCA
SMED
ECRS
5S
1.SEIRI
: CLEARING
:
SEIRI denotes
action to identify and sort out all items into necessary and unnecessary items
and discard all unnecessary items.
How
to practice SEIRI
1.
Separate
the wanted and unwanted; classify everything by frequency of use.
2.
Always
repair the repairable items immediately. don’t let them lie around
3.
Throw
away unwanted items .do not keep them with a vague idea they may me needed.
Defectives especially must be identified clearly at fixed intervals.
4.
Develop
a clear and well –understood policy of disposal of broken, unrepeatable or
unwanted items .Don’t let things accumulate for want of policy.
2.SEITON:ARRANGING
SEITON means to
arrange everything in proper order so it can be easily picked up for use .place
for everything and everything in its place.
Consequences
of not practicing SEITON on the shop
floor.
1. Things are
seldom available when needed .search squards are all the time.
2. Items are’
lost’ in stores.
3. Items
–defectives and good ones ,or similar looking materials-get mixed up.
4.Accidents or
near-accidents occur due to cluster.
3.SEISO:
SWEEPING
SEISO means to sweep the workplace thoroughly so
that there is no dust ,oil soot ,etc, anywhere.
Consequences
of not practicing SEISO are
1.Mist machines
are affected by dust and dirt . Their performance may go down, they may wear
out faster. The cost can be huge.
2.Dust and dirt
on products ,material, packing boxes will almost certainly affect either their performance quality or at least their aesthetic quality.
3.A Dust and
dirty place is unpleasant to work in .
4.SEIKETSU
: CLEANLINESS
SEIKETSU means
maintaining a high standard of workplace organization and house keeping at all
times .
Consequences
of not practicing SEIKETSU :
1.
Good
health and safety the practice of Seiketsu .
2.
Hazardous
chemicals, dusty chemicals, fumes, etc, can make it a dangerous place to work
in unless controlled.
3.
Working
thoroughly cleans a place and makes the workplace pleasant. So an unwashed
workplace can become unpleasant.
4.
Personal
hygiene is also essential for a healthy workforce.
5.SHITSUKE : DISCIPLINE
SHITSUKE denotes Self-discipline especially with regard to safety rules
and punctuality. 5s means everything in its place, people
must also be in their place at the right time , in the right attire . It is
management’s responsibility to train people to practice 5s with discipline.
How
to practice SHITSUKE :
1.
All
employees must be trained in all aspects of 4s . This must be done through
class room actual practice and also by well illustrated instruction and display
.
2.
Supervisors
must correct wrong practices every day on the spot .
3.
If
all the members of an office or workshop are not present when they are supposed
to be it is poor 5s , Punctuality is the
backbone of 5s .
4.
Timelines
also applies to preparation of reports filling out the charts , etc .
PDCA
CYCLE (OR DEMING WHEEL)
The basic plan -Do-study- Act cycle was originally developed by Walter
A.shewart,.but it was popularized by Edward Deming and that’s why it’s called
the Deming cycle or Deming wheel .It’s
an effective continues improvement technique .
PLAN
Define the problem:
Analyse the causes and draft an action
plan for solving the problem
Determine the quality objectives and the
critical factor s
Collect and analyses the necessary
process data
Generate the process data
Select the most feasible solution: and
work it out
Do
First implement the plan on a limited
scale or conduct an experiment to test the proposed improvement. Collection
data here by essential.
Train all involved employees in the use
of quality improvement methods and technique
Describe the process which is considered
for improvement and form projects team to lead the process
Check
Evaluate the trail project with the
performance indicators.
Verify whether the improvement has been
successful or not
Act
Act to implement proven improvements
.the choices are introduce the adjust or reject it
The improvement are documented in
standard procedure so all employees are well –informed on how to handle in
future
Usually, the cycle will be repeated
under the different circumstances and condition to test how consistent the
results are.
ECRS
technique:
ECRS Techniques
This tool can be used for
·
Set up change loss reduction
·
Tool change loss reduction and Mean time to repair reduction
It is also used in
·
Layout optimization study
·
Operator work load analysis
·
Process de-bottle necking
·
Assembly line – time
reduction
·
Office TPM (Process time
reduction)
After activity mapping for set up change/tool change / Mean Time
to Repair
·
Use Internal & External analysis tool
·
After the external / internal analysis, the time for setup will
come down
·
Internal time is considered as new setup time.
·
This setup time contains many unwanted activity which can be
considered for time reduction.
·
ECRS technique is used for further time reduction
ECRS is unique approach towards process activity optimization with
following core principle
Elimination
Elimination of activity is the best
One shot setup is ideal
No change over is the ultimate
Elimination of activity is the best
One shot setup is ideal
No change over is the ultimate
Combination
If elimination is not possible
Combine the activity
If elimination is not possible
Combine the activity
Reduction
If combination is not possible
Reduce the activity time
If combination is not possible
Reduce the activity time
Simplification
If activity time cannot be reduced
Do kaizens to simplify the activities
If activity time cannot be reduced
Do kaizens to simplify the activities
RESULT AND
DISCUSSION:
The following
charts show’s the results of
No of Internal and
External Activity details
Result
of iteration -1
Chart – No.
of Internal and External activity after
Iteration 1
Internal
Vs External time details after Iteration 1
Iteration were done to reduce the total
number of internal and externals activates.
Result
of iteration -2
No. of Internal
and External activity after Iteration 2
Internal Vs
External time details after Iteration 2
Result
of iteration -3
No. of Internal and External
activity after Iteration - 3
Internal Vs
External time details after Iteration – 3
Result
of iteration -4
No. of Internal
and External activity after Iteration -
4
Internal Vs
External time details after Iteration – 4
Cell
Efficiency
Total
Available Time (16 hours x 25 days ) = 400
hrs.
Total
Losses
= 96.5
hrs.
Set
up loss alone
= 32
hrs.
Actual
machining time (400-96.5) =
303.5 hrs.
Cell Efficiency =
Actual machining time / Total Available time
= (303.5 / 400)*100 = 76
%
Loss
Cost Calculation
S.No
|
Description
|
Quantity
|
Units
|
1
|
Cycle time /
Component
|
60
|
sec.
|
2
|
Output / hour
|
60
|
nos.
|
3
|
Total output
loss /setting(8*60)
|
480
|
no’s
|
4
|
Total output
loss / month(480*4)
|
1920
|
no’s
|
5
|
Total output
loss / year(480*4*12)
|
23040
|
no’s
|
6
|
Cost/component
(in Rs.)
|
153.50
|
INR
|
7
|
Total loss
cost / year in lakhs (23040*153.5)
|
35.37
|
Lakhs
|
Target
time:-
Set up time
reduction – Target
Result:-
Set up time
reduction – Result
After improvement the set up time was brought down from 498 minutes to
113 minutes.
Conclusion:-
The set up time was brought down to 113 minutes from
498minutes.This was possible by applying the SMED techniques.Still there is
scope for further reduction by fine tuning the process .In the above case the
major share of time was consumed for removing the fixture and again mounting
the required one.By doing so time consumed for that activity was more compared
to other activities. Hence this was taken up and was brought down to minimum
possible. But still we find some scope to reduce further and that will be for
inspection time.Hence by applying the SMED technique by a systematic way we can
reduce the set up time.
Good. But I could not see the charts.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the meaning of SMED?
ReplyDeleteSMED - 'Single Minute Exchange of Dies'. A nice tool used generally to reduce the changeover times.
DeleteCan me download with PDF
ReplyDeleteYes
ReplyDelete